Curtain Harley Davidson

Actual election winner: non-voters with the greatest increase of 6.9%

---

non-voters to lap at 29.2% as the largest ethnic party, the CDU with 27.3%

"Why does actually no one from the actual election winner this election, "asks Hartz4 platform spokeswoman Brigitte Valle Thin . "The parties - all of them - are on yesterday's election was the voter abgewatscht unambiguous. It is time that the parties to recover lead and bring about change in their party-state abuse. The real question should read after this election, what the parties actually have legitimacy to speak for us, the people? Yesterday they lost this final, because the non-voters - by overtaking, also placed first CDU (27.3%) - by a landslide election victory of 29.2% and the highest growth of 6.9% is definitely become the most popular party. "

After a first analysis of the federal election, the Hartz4 platform , plattform.de www.hartz4-, www.grundeinkommen with the Wiesbaden-based initiative, basic income, -wiesbaden.de and the election initiative choose basic income, www.grundeinkommen-waehlen.de , said: The election has mobilized an overwhelming protest against the improper appropriation of the state by the parties. This party state contradicts both the "All-state authority is--the-people-off" of the Basic Law and the independent powers of our government in legislative, executive and judiciary, to the satisfaction of the initiative collected arbitrarily from parties. "Now is the hour in which the parties need to make this unique democratic electoral vote of non-voters," said Brigitte Valle Thin.

Wiesbaden, 28 September 2009

Brigitte Valle Thin

Press
Hartz4-Plattform no poverty! - No hunger! - No loss of human dignity!
citizen initiative for the introduction of an unconditional basic income and the information and support for Hartz IV affected
www.hartz4-plattform.de
and
Wiesbaden Initiative basic income
We prefer to work for people than money
www. basic income-wiesbaden.de
fon 0611 - 172 12 21
mobile 0160-912794 65 e
info@grundeinkommen-wiesbaden.de

Casehard Lock Numbers

Last call before the W ⊗ St

power of opinion leaders and grass-roots democracy a Citizens' Movement?

On 27 September is St W ⊗ and no go?

is No, do not get it! ...

Dear friends and friends of an unconditional basic income!

But who and what is the idea of an unconditional basic income next weekend to choose?

There are the so-called protagonists . The company can claim to determine what's what. Among them, candidates that the next weekend in the Bundestag want to be elected - with and without a party card. Even with them - which we assume best intentions - we must take note: A short basic income election campaign has yet to get into parliament so far detached from us that they raise while on platforms the impression of speaking for the people - we the people, but not even our questions check a candidate answer.

And then there are the non-party direct candidates who are still very close to the wish and will of the people. For them there is a lot of enthusiastic involvement on a real unconditional basic income in existence and some have locking height. But they are lost from a gold-rushing election campaign pushed aside.

What actually took the idea of social change to be done by real income so that,

• that a handful of people - setting the tone and the way - - not to listen or to ask what the foundation really wants as we complain to the parties? become
• that give away from a spontaneous enthusiasm Crowns, a well-organized public relations campaign with gold-painted mobile campaign is?
• that is explained in this context: "The new color of the work is ... Gold "?

Not all that glitters is gold!

Would we not rather that the claims of the Basic income is a first step towards a new culture of political opinion is ?

conclusion: Is not that a basic income in a broad civic movement better than at parties or interest groups? Does it not, this idea to protect before officials take over the case and they want to take away from you?

... And to W ⊗ St ? A little civil disobedience must be already!
So put signal: select Go there and valid - en masse, so that politicians finally wake up!
And then - get up and put the BGE-based democracy movement - just a massive scale! www.grundeinkommen

citizens' basic income Wiesbaden -wiesbaden.de

Hartz4 Platform www.hartz4-plattform.de

www.grundeinkommen choice initiative -waehlen.de

How Does A Tumor Become Calcified

Alarm Clock!

And if it after is worse than with Hartz IV?

It is still not too late to before the election closer look!

Dear friends and friends of an unconditional basic income!

also Basic income-choice campaigners are promising. And because they know that just put Hartz IV-tortured high hopes for the unconditional basic income, they are in the weeks before the election to be particularly common before the consortiums. Will they actually hold different than previous MPs after the election whatever they promise? Or is there too much kept in the vague, which is not so quite fit the expectations?

We once read in Werner Goetz book and recalculated. He starts with a 800 € basic income. Of these, only 600 are left € when around 200 € for health insurance subtracted. Since he is on a par with the CDU- Althaus model. That this is not front and back enough to know Hartz IV-experienced long ago. Others can count on five fingers when they imagine having to pay them only the worst such as rent, heating, electricity, telephone, bus, clothing, food and the many small monthly fee.

And if one works in addition, provides Götz Werner it this way: a previous income of 1,600 € will reduce it to 800 € as entrepreneurs, because the employee already has a basic income. In the deduction of all payroll taxes were then the employee more than € 400 before - his BGE-profit.

For the entrepreneur, the bill provides for far more positive. The numbers remain unmentioned in the book. We therefore expect even more: the entrepreneur first 800 € saves labor costs and secondly, its share of wage costs of 400 €. A rather uneven results: Entrepreneurs profit € 1,200 - three times to say the employee profit of 400 €.

from our findings is rather skeptical: a basic income, which no one can live on? Since forced labor is programmed. And what about the supposed freedom, by this model, BGE more room for negotiation with the employer to have? Forced to work for all - because the ATF is not sufficient - rather less than more jobs available: no chance, then "negotiate" on low income level depressed deals ever.

" freedom," creativity ", a country full of" queens and kings "? Ade their better-times-dreams! Then come really hard (z) e time!

Even social judges lose their jobs again, they, too, because we will no longer be able to ask for help.

... Wake up!

Too low basic salary is anything but an unconditional basic income. It is - despite the abolition of public authorities' harassment - worse than Hartz IV

It's like Opel and Magna: As long as you do not know what's in the fine print is all just empty campaign promises!

And the terrifying account is presented after the election.

www.grundeinkommen citizens' basic income Wiesbaden -wiesbaden.de

Hartz4 platform www.hartz4 plattform.de-

www.grundeinkommen choice initiative choose. de

Indoor Basketball Courts 08330

acclamation!

dial affinities

and

unity in basic income models.

Is that enough to participate effectively in society?

Dear friends and friends of an unconditional basic income!

Whether it is good or not, that in recent weeks appeared more and more election-related in our ranks, we will not judge. We have the direct and list candidates just asked what the basic income models do realize it.

Not only that have responded very much has surprised us. Thank you for this!

also the clear trend of their ideas, to what extent the BGE provided and how should it be implemented, we would hardly expect.

least € 1000-1500 calls a month, the overwhelming majority of 69%. Equally convincing are allowed with a majority 63% of those in favor of a cumulative basic income, the full supplementary income. Only a small minority of 6% supported a substitutive BGE, in which the basic income should be deducted from earned income.

for cumulative basic income	420 – 800 €	9%
	1.000 €	34%
	1.200 – 1.500 €	20%
for substitutive basic income	€ 1,200	3%
	no € - indication	3%
no concrete implementation model	700 €	3%
	1.000 €	6%
	1.200 – 1.500 €	9%
no information		13%

(We have written to all candidates who stated email address)

" Eliminates" now a majority aspired cumulative basic income 1000-1500 € actually "consistent poverty" - as a prominent representative party formulated?

We have the well-known to critics of modern feudalism (Meudalismus), Dr. Harald Wozniewski ( www.meudalismus.dr-wo.de ) asked

How can a cumulative BGE 1000-1500 € against the rampant poverty our society afford?

Dr. Wozniewski: " The contribution of such a BGE for the elimination of poverty is low if the BGE is not linked to money growth . What many do not know is that the money supply - that is, the purchasing power - mad at us fast growing. Since the currency reform of 1948, the amount of money in Germany is on average about 10% a year (!) Grown. Those who keep up with its own purchasing power here will, therefore, his income has also increased annually by 10%. News is the money supply M1 in Germany at € 28,273.63 per household. This is the amount of money that a household of the middle class have on average than cash or a demand deposit at a bank (which, of course, protecting the assets is included). Also at that number you can see that even 1500 € BGE are far too little to someone out of poverty back to "lift" in the middle class. Who at the beginning of the month € 1,500 BGE gets the money and spending even in the same month, has an average money owned from 750 €, which is only 2.7% of what a middle class household must have. "

How can the impoverishment of society work against?

Dr. Wozniewski: "Who wants to fight poverty must eliminate the wealth. Wealth of a means not only conceptually accessible while the other poverty. Economically rich and poor are interdependent. Bear witness of economic studies, that the wealth of individual citizens by the simultaneous depletion of the rest of the population may arise. It is in the long run as in the Monopoly game: In the beginning, all the same, at the end is a rich and the others are broke. Who wants to be freely accessible on the rich are getting richer, which lies to the public when he claims to want to do something about poverty. If you want to take away the rich have nothing, we would at least prevent them every day even richer. Only then will the rest of the population has a chance to catch up, or climb out of poverty. "

... We also consider the cumulative model for the only honest unconditional. However - it remains only a "Stellschräubchen. The factual Change is one of political courage that takes advantage of the current crisis as an opportunity to "cause-and-control" and to develop a BGE model do not lose sight that it mainly comes to an equitable economic system to work, all of the jointly generated wealth involved!

www.grundeinkommen citizens' basic income Wiesbaden -wiesbaden.de

Hartz4 platform www.hartz4 plattform.de-

choice initiative www.grundeinkommen-waehlen.de