The battle for "personal freedom"
In the end, we live in, shoot the fighters for all sorts of "personal freedoms" such as homosexuality, marijuana, or even computer games only way out of the ground. The exponents of these movements see themselves as brave freedom fighters. These movements will now "the law" or the "public Opinion change ", so that it can find all the human toll when two Gayboyz smooch in the town or a punk public 'nen Joint infectious.
There are people who talk about things, and there are those who do these things. In fact, it is seen live has always been a problem in Germany or the United States as too gay promiskös One can also easily smoke pot or take other drugs, the secret is simple:... Vice-up and sent to stop your face
The people that talk about these things, they hang from the rooftops, encounter other people who have a different opinion on the head. Moralisierenderweise the roar then a "pervert" or "junkie" the other drivel about the "intolerance" of the opposite side. The question I ask myself is whether this approach is practical and what is the true motivation of the freedom fighters.
to Practice: The problem persists as long as current as the struggle for its solution. During this time the public (and executive) attention is increasingly turned to the certain topic. Now times win the reformers. The problem disappears from the public short-term memory. At some point somebody is thinking of times and again that the problem is not solved yet and is launching an initiative, all turn to look the other way. Same positions, new distribution of forces. The bottom line is always blabber all shit and nothing happens.
The upper one is deliberately very general, but everyone will recognize some truth in it.
The motivation of our freedom fighters is not the freedom itself, which is absolutely necessary in practical terms, who wants to can fuck people of the same sex and when I block I make 2 phone calls and my room is full of grass and hashish.
Some of these freedom fighters tell me that they want not only that their goal is achieved, they also want public opinion (deine!) to mean change that you find good, what they are fighting. Gays do not want being gay as "good" is like his hetero-and pothead that smoking pot as "good" is like alcohol. The no more and no less, that is, as freedom fighters, those who argue, are nothing but opinion Nazis, shitty fucker, want to restrict freedom. And for what?
Anyone who is in need to smoke a joint in his knowledge that it is accepted by society is a poor sausage. Anyone who needs something makes itself totally dependent on "public opinion" and is absolutely not free. Like flags in the wind, the desire to control which way the wind blows. As if it would interest anyone, what you do. Keep your face and everything is cool. There will always be people who have different opinions, but that one must not interested yet. I do not give a damn who thinks what about me.
is the best that this feeling of Akzeptiertseins what you want to achieve our freedom Kämp Ferchen nothing else than just that: a feeling. And emotions are something one experiences subjectively. Akzeptiertsein ... an idea, a better hallucination that you want to indulge in only when the substance was removed from the favorite BtmSG. Man sets himself an arbitrary target and is pleased to have reached it ... you excited yet so of life. What is interested in any law books but no one ...
Nothing is certain, there is no total control. Nothing is forbidden and anything goes. Do what you want is the whole of the law. And the law is in the heart. One must only accept it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment